.svg)
Estimate the time and margin opportunity in your current workflow.
Answer a few questions to build a directional estimate for your team.
What does your team work on?
Untick anything that doesn't apply.
How big is your business?
Estimating for one brand? Use that brand's sales and team.
Across all channels.
We've suggested 22 based on your sales. Change it if you know.
Adjust cost of goods sold (optional)
Product costs as a share of sales. We use 55% as the default. Adjust this to match your business.
Your estimate
How much of your team would use VibeIQ?
Estimated annual opportunity
Tick at least one type of work above to see your estimate.
$439K / year
Based on your inputs and VibeIQ’s benchmark assumptions.
Where the value comes from
Time saved
$192K
About 3,500 hours a year
Estimated margin opportunity
$248K
Modeled from the potential impact of earlier add/drop and buying decisions.
We treat time saved as capacity returned to the team, not headcount reduction.
What changes with VibeIQ
How this estimate works
We model two sources of value: time returned to your team and potential margin impact from earlier assortment decisions. The model uses your sales, team size and COGS alongside benchmark assumptions derived from VibeIQ customer engagements.
We intentionally discount the modeled opportunity based on expected adoption, and we exclude benefits we can’t reasonably quantify. You can review the assumptions below and change the inputs that are specific to your business.
See the assumptions and math
Your inputs
Benchmark assumptions
Time saved: for each type of work you select, the model uses the documented hours teams spend rebuilding files, re-keying data and chasing updates, scaled to your team size. We use a blended labor cost of $54/hour.iA blended, fully loaded hourly cost based on the mix of roles in our reference team. Fully loaded means salary plus benefits, payroll taxes and overhead, not salary alone.
Estimated margin opportunity: modeled only for building & reviewing the assortment, where earlier add/drop and buying decisions affect what you buy. The model applies 1.8% to your cost of goods (sales × COGS %), then discounts it for adoption.
Benchmarks: derived from 71 documented pain points across 9 workflows in VibeIQ customer engagements, normalized to a reference team of 109 people at $500M in sales. The suggested team size uses the same ratio (about 22 people per $100M).
Adoption: to avoid overstating value, the model assumes even full adoption captures only 50% of the modeled opportunity. A pilot group counts 10% and most of the team counts 25%. The same inputs always give the same result.
Not included: potentially significant benefits like closing assortment gaps, reducing duplication and improving price-point and regional coverage, because they can’t be reasonably quantified from these inputs.
Estimates are directional, based on your inputs and VibeIQ benchmark assumptions. Actual results vary with adoption and scope.